The process of identifying the best available evidence to make decisions about practices that should be deployed to support individuals in a given population (McKibbon, 1998, see Vivanti, 2022). Practices that meet a predefined set of evidentiary criteria are labelled “evidence-based practices” to promote their adoption by service providers. However, there are no independent standards or bodies to regulate what qualifies as “best” or “high-quality” evidence. This is why, when using recognized standards failed to find any support for widely promoted autism interventions, autism researchers unethically responded by lowering or discarding standards for autistics, to accommodate the extremely poor quality of the autism intervention literature. Also, no EBP framework considers whether intervention researchers should measure or report on adverse events (unintended negative consequences of interventions that can cause short- or long-term harms).